United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2003·No. 01-31199·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31199 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEVIN WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-383-2 -------------------- February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Kevin

Williams (“Williams”), has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Williams has not responded to the motion. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-31199 -2-

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)