United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2002·No. 01-30435·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30435 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RON WILLIAMS, also known as Shorty,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-170-17-N -------------------- November 27, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Ron Williams has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Williams has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se

brief of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and

of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)