United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2002·No. 01-10899·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10899 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REGINALD DESHAUN WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:99-CR-88-1-C -------------------- February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Lanehart, Jr., court-appointed appellate counsel for

Reginald Deshaun Williams, has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Willlams has not responded to the motion. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)