United States v. Williams

357 F. App'x 540
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. 09-7882·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 357 F. App'x 540 (4th Cir. 2009).

357 F. App'x 540 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. United States
177 L. Ed. 2d 1072 (Supreme Court, 2010)