United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 F. App'x 280
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2009·No. 09-6835·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6835

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COREY ANTIONE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Henry Ronald Bookman, a/k/a Corey Antoine Williams,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00031-FDW-13)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Patrick Foster, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF MARK FOSTER, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Antione Williams appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Williams, No.

3:01-cr-00031-FDW-13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related