United States v. Wilburn

20 C.M.A. 86, 20 USCMA 86, 42 C.M.R. 278, 1970 CMA LEXIS 741, 1970 WL 7071
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided September 11, 1970·No. No. 23,135·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

In United States v Williams, 20 USCMA 47, 42 CMR 239 (1970), we held that failure of the military judge to inquire of the appellant personally if he had anything to say in his own behalf before sentencing did not make the later sentence illegal. That same issue in this case is controlled by our opinion in United States v Williams, supra. The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilburn, 20 C.M.A. 86, 20 USCMA 86, 42 C.M.R. 278, 1970 CMA LEXIS 741, 1970 WL 7071 (cma 1970).

20 C.M.A. 86 (United States v. Wilburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Martinez
17 M.J. 916 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1984)
United States v. Pena
11 M.J. 509 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1981)
United States v. Koek
6 M.J. 540 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Walker
4 M.J. 936 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Hawkins
2 M.J. 23 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Taylor
20 C.M.A. 93 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)