United States v. Wilburn

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Wilburn

20 C.M.A. 86, 20 USCMA 86, 42 C.M.R. 278, 1970 CMA LEXIS 741, 1970 WL 7071

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedSeptember 11, 1970

DocketNo. 23,135

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 20 C.M.A. 86 (United States v. Wilburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Wilburn, 20 C.M.A. 86, 20 USCMA 86, 42 C.M.R. 278, 1970 CMA LEXIS 741, 1970 WL 7071 (cma 1970).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

In United States v Williams, 20 USCMA 47, 42 CMR 239 (1970), we held that failure of the military judge to inquire of the appellant personally if he had anything to say in his own behalf before sentencing did not make the later sentence illegal. That same issue in this case is controlled by our opinion in United States v Williams, supra. The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

In United States v Williams, 20 USCMA 47, 42 CMR 239 (1970), we held that failure of the military judge to inquire of the appellant personally if he had anything to say in his own behalf before sentencing did not make the later sentence illegal. That same issue in this case is controlled by our opinion in United States v Williams, supra. The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 C.M.A. 86, 20 USCMA 86, 42 C.M.R. 278, 1970 CMA LEXIS 741, 1970 WL 7071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilburn-cma-1970.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack