United States v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2008·No. 08-7316·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTELL WHITAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:98-cr-01016-MBS-1)

Submitted: September 17, 2008 Decided: October 14, 2008

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martell Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Martell Whitaker appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States. v. Whitaker, No. 0:98-cr-01016-

MBS-1 (D.S.C. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 22, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Whitaker, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Whitaker (United States v. Whitaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related