United States v. Whitaker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7948

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTELL WHITAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-98-1016)

Submitted: April 21, 2006 Decided: June 5, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martell Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Martell Whitaker appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. CR-98-1016 (D.S.C.

Nov. 29, 2005). We grant the motion to vacate the supplemental

informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -