United States v. Watson

20 F. App'x 206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F. App'x 696
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2001·No. 01-7072·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his mo *207 tions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-01-2115-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2001; filed June 14, 2001, entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watson, 20 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 206 (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related