United States v. Watson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 1999·No. 98-7475·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRY LEE WATSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-143, CA-96-3243-6-20AK)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Thomas Stepp, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Green- ville, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Corley Lucius, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-92-

143; CA-96-3243-6-20AK (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watson, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Watson (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related