United States v. Watson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-98-4125-7)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no re-
versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-98-4125-7 (D.S.C.
Jan. 3 & Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Watson (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.