United States v. Watson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2000·No. 00-6241·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-98-4125-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no re-

versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-98-4125-7 (D.S.C.

Jan. 3 & Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watson, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Watson (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related