United States v. Washington

864 F.3d 1017, 2017 WL 2193387, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8804
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 2017
DocketNo. 13-35474
StatusPublished

This text of 864 F.3d 1017 (United States v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Washington, 864 F.3d 1017, 2017 WL 2193387, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8804 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinions

Concurrence by Judge W. FLETCHER;

Opinion Respecting Denial by Judge O’SCANNLAIN;

Statement by

Judge HURWITZ

ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Fletcher and Gould have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Ezra so recommends.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the non re-cused active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 11, 2016, are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki
413 F.3d 266 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Winters v. United States
207 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Cramer v. United States
261 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY
470 U.S. 226 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho
521 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 1997)
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY
544 U.S. 197 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
617 F.3d 114 (Second Circuit, 2010)
United States v. State Of Washington
759 F.2d 1353 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Skokomish Indian Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe in Its Own Capacity as a Class Representative and as Parens Patriae Denny S. Hurtado Gordon A. James Joseph Pavel Anne Pavel Maures P. Tinaza Celeste F. Vigil Roslynne L. Reed Gary W. Peterson Rita C. Andrews Tom G. Strong Marie E. Gouley Victoria J. Pavel Dennis W. Allen Joseph Andrews, Sr. Zetha Cush Elsie M. Allen Alex L. Gouley, Jr. Lawrence L. Kenyon Doris Miller Gerald B. Miller Helen M. Rudy Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr. Nick G. Wilbur, Sr. v. United States of America Tacoma Public Utilities, a Washington Municipal Corporation City of Tacoma, a Washington Municipal Corporation William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Robert Lane Tim Strege G.E. Vaughn, Skokomish Indian Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe in Its Own Capacity as a Class Representative and as Parens Patriae Denny S. Hurtado Gordon A. James Joseph Pavel Anne Pavel Maures P. Tinaza Celeste F. Vigil Roslynne L. Reed Gary W. Peterson Rita C. Andrews Tom G. Strong Marie E. Gouley Victoria J. Pavel Dennis W. Allen Joseph Andrews, Sr. Zetha Cush Elsie M. Allen Alex L. Gouley, Jr. Lawrence L. Kenyon Doris Miller Gerald B. Miller Helen M. Rudy Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr. Nick G. Wilbur, Sr., Skokomish Indian Tribal Members for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Tacoma Public Utilities, a Washington Municipal Corporation City of Tacoma, a Washington Municipal Corporation William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Robert Lane Tim Strege G.E. Vaughn United States Internal Revenue Service
410 F.3d 506 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. State of Washington
384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Washington, 1974)
United States v. Washington
157 F.3d 630 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Miller v. Gammie
335 F.3d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Washington
506 F. Supp. 187 (W.D. Washington, 1980)
United States v. Washington
694 F.2d 1374 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Adair
723 F.2d 1394 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Washington
759 F.2d 1353 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 F.3d 1017, 2017 WL 2193387, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-washington-ca9-2017.