United States v. Washington

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Washington

864 F.3d 1017, 2017 WL 2193387, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8804

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 827 F.3d 836 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2017·No. No. 13-35474·Published

Opinions

Concurrence by Judge W. FLETCHER;

Opinion Respecting Denial by Judge O’SCANNLAIN;

Statement by

Judge HURWITZ

ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Fletcher and Gould have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Ezra so recommends.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the non re-cused active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 11, 2016, are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concurrence by Judge W. FLETCHER;

Opinion Respecting Denial by Judge O’SCANNLAIN;

Statement by

Judge HURWITZ

ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Fletcher and Gould have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Ezra so recommends.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the non re-cused active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 11, 2016, are DENIED.

United States v. Washington, 864 F.3d 1017, 2017 WL 2193387, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8804 (9th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

864 F.3d 1017 (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Skokomish Indian Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe in Its Own Capacity as a Class Representative and as Parens Patriae Denny S. Hurtado Gordon A. James Joseph Pavel Anne Pavel Maures P. Tinaza Celeste F. Vigil Roslynne L. Reed Gary W. Peterson Rita C. Andrews Tom G. Strong Marie E. Gouley Victoria J. Pavel Dennis W. Allen Joseph Andrews, Sr. Zetha Cush Elsie M. Allen Alex L. Gouley, Jr. Lawrence L. Kenyon Doris Miller Gerald B. Miller Helen M. Rudy Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr. Nick G. Wilbur, Sr. v. United States of America Tacoma Public Utilities, a Washington Municipal Corporation City of Tacoma, a Washington Municipal Corporation William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Robert Lane Tim Strege G.E. Vaughn, Skokomish Indian Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe in Its Own Capacity as a Class Representative and as Parens Patriae Denny S. Hurtado Gordon A. James Joseph Pavel Anne Pavel Maures P. Tinaza Celeste F. Vigil Roslynne L. Reed Gary W. Peterson Rita C. Andrews Tom G. Strong Marie E. Gouley Victoria J. Pavel Dennis W. Allen Joseph Andrews, Sr. Zetha Cush Elsie M. Allen Alex L. Gouley, Jr. Lawrence L. Kenyon Doris Miller Gerald B. Miller Helen M. Rudy Ronald D. Twiddy, Sr. Nick G. Wilbur, Sr., Skokomish Indian Tribal Members for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Tacoma Public Utilities, a Washington Municipal Corporation City of Tacoma, a Washington Municipal Corporation William Barker, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Tom Hilyard, Tacoma Public Utilities Board Member in His Official Capacity Robert Lane Tim Strege G.E. Vaughn United States Internal Revenue Service

410 F.3d 506 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)

United States v. State of Washington

384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Washington, 1974)

United States v. Washington

157 F.3d 630 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Midwater Trawlers Co-operative v. Department of Commerce

282 F.3d 710 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Miller v. Gammie

335 F.3d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

United States v. Washington

506 F. Supp. 187 (W.D. Washington, 1980)

United States v. Washington

694 F.2d 1374 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)

United States v. Adair

723 F.2d 1394 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

United States v. Washington

759 F.2d 1353 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)

Opinions

Related