United States v. Washington
This text of United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D April 23, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-51098 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CURTIS REUBEN WASHINGTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-97-1 --------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Curtis Reuben Washington has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Washington has
received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has submitted a
pro se response. Our review of the pleadings filed by counsel
and Washington and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Washington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-washington-ca5-2003.