United States v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 F.3d 222
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2003·No. 02-51098·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D April 23, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-51098 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS REUBEN WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-97-1 --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Curtis Reuben Washington has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Washington has

received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has submitted a

pro se response. Our review of the pleadings filed by counsel

and Washington and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)