Richards v. Wisconsin

Supreme Court

Richards v. Wisconsin

519 U.S. 1052, 117 S. Ct. 679

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 3, 1997

DocketNo. 96-5955

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 519 U.S. 1052 (Richards v. Wisconsin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. Wisconsin, 519 U.S. 1052, 117 S. Ct. 679 (1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Wis. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, February 11, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 7, 1997. A reply brief, if any, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, March 18, 1997. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Wis. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, February 11, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 7, 1997. A reply brief, if any, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, March 18, 1997. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 U.S. 1052, 117 S. Ct. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-wisconsin-scotus-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack