United States v. Ward

323 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2009·No. No. 08-8485·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antwon E. Ward appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ward, No. 2:04-cr-00073-JBF-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 27, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ward, 323 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2009).

323 F. App'x 227 (United States v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)