United States v. Ward
Opinion
George Allen Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006), and to compel the government to file a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ward, No. 4:94-cr-00070-HCM (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
225 F. App'x 184 (United States v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.