United States v. Walker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6040

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER WALKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00123-REP-2)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Walker appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Walker, No.

3:96-cr-00123-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2008); see also United

States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We further deny

Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED