United States v. Walker
This text of United States v. Walker (United States v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7796
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
IVEY WALKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-97-22; CA-02-66-3)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 22, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ivey Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, David Alan Brown, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ivey Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing two of the claims raised in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)
motion and ordering the Government to respond to his remaining
claims. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The
order Walker seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Given this
disposition, we deny his pending motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-walker-ca4-2006.