United States v. Waddell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Waddell. Read the opinion of the Court — 412 F. App'x 577
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2009·No. 08-7096·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7096

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRIAN O’NEAL WADDELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00034-RLV-5)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, Tanzania Cannon-Eckerle, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, Matthew R. Segal, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brian O’Neal Waddell appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United

States v. Waddell, No. 5:02-cr-00034-RLV-5 (W.D.N.C. June 17,

2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).

We deny Waddell’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Waddell, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Waddell (United States v. Waddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)