United States v. Waddell

325 F. App'x 229
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2009
DocketNo. 08-7096
StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Waddell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Waddell, 325 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brian O’Neal Waddell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Waddell, No. 5:02-cr-00034-RLV-5 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Waddell’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F. App'x 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-waddell-ca4-2009.