United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
This text of 176 Ct. Cl. 1391 (United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Claims (168 Ct. Cl. 522, 339 F. 2d 606) holding that the Disputes clause of the contract does not extend to breach of contract claims not redressable under other clauses of the contract by agreement of the parties and refusing to give finality to factual findings of the contracting agency’s Board of Contract Appeals relative to delay damages claims, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 8, 1965 (382 U.S. 900), and on June 6, 1966 (384 U.S. 394), affirmed the judgment of the Court of Claims in its interpretation of the scope of the Disputes clause and reversed the court with respect to its refusal to give finality, in a suit for delay damages and breach of contract, to factual findings made by the Board in disputes which were properly before it for consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 Ct. Cl. 1391, 168 Ct. Cl. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-utah-construction-mining-co-cc-1966.