United States v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2000·No. 00-6025·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLIE THOMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-88-152-G)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charlie Thompson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion for relief from judgment in his 1989 conviction.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Thompson, No. CR-88-152-G

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 3 & Nov. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thompson, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.