United States v. Thompson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7690
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOYCE TORIAN THOMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-53-BR, CA-97-699-5-BR)
Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 20, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce Torian Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joyce Thompson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
refusing to entertain a successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West 1994 & Supp. 1998), without authorization from this court. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find
no reversible error. The district court acted in accordance with
the dictates of § 2255. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Thompson’s motion for
oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.