United States v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 1998·No. 98-6341·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BARRY GLEN THOMPSON, a/k/a Berry G. Thompson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-115, CA-97-429-6)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Graham James, Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellant. Monica Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charles- ton, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Thompson, Nos. CR-95-115; CA-97-429-6 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thompson, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related