United States v. Taylor

323 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2009·No. No. 08-8480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 7, 2008). We deny Taylor’s motion to schedule oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, 323 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2009).

323 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dave Taylor
Fourth Circuit, 2020