United States v. Taylor

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 2007
Docket06-7195
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Taylor, (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM RAYMOND TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL)

Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Raymond Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Raymond Taylor appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL (E.D.

Va. June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-ca4-2007.