United States v. Taylor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 F. App'x 249
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2009·No. 08-8480·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8480

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. G. Wingate Grant, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. United States v.

Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2008). We

deny Taylor’s motion to schedule oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related