United States v. Taylor

752 F.3d 254, 2014 WL 2154375, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9670
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 23, 2014·No. 11-2201(L)·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Following disposition of this appeal on March 4, 2014, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.

ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judge, concurs by opinion in the denial of rehearing en banc. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc. REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, joined by JOSÉ A. CABRANES, RICHARD C. WESLEY, PETER W. HALL, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, and CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, Circuit Judges, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, 752 F.3d 254, 2014 WL 2154375, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9670 (2d Cir. 2014).

752 F.3d 254 (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of New York v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
964 F.3d 150 (Second Circuit, 2020)
Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. Seagull
936 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Bert
Second Circuit, 2016
European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
783 F.3d 123 (Second Circuit, 2015)