European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.

Second Circuit

European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.

783 F.3d 123, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5991, 2015 WL 1609994

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 2015

Docket11-2475

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 783 F.3d 123 (European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 783 F.3d 123, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5991, 2015 WL 1609994 (2d Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinions

[124]*124PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judge, concurs by opinion in the denial of rehearing en banc.

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge, joined by JOSÉ A. CABRANES, REENA RAGGI, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, and GERARD E. LYNCH, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge, joined by DENNIS JACOBS, REENA RAGGI, and DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, joined by DENNIS JACOBS, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, and DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

ORDER

Following disposition of this appeal, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI