United States v. Steglich
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7419
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Steglich, No. 3:00-cr-00063-
jpj-9 (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Steglich (United States v. Steglich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.