United States v. Steglich
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his second motion for reduction of
sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Steglich, No. 3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9 (W.D.
Va. Dec. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Steglich (United States v. Steglich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.