United States v. Steele

105 F.3d 603, 1997 WL 28972
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 11, 1997·No. 94-3139·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-3139

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Cross-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM O. STEELE,

Defendant-Appellant,

Cross-Appellee.

--------------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida --------------------------

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion: 117 F.3d 1231, 11th Cir. July 24, 1997)

(December 4, 1997)

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603, 1997 WL 28972 (11th Cir. 1997).

105 F.3d 603 (United States v. Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
178 F.3d 1230 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Fern
117 F.3d 1298 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. McArthur
108 F.3d 1350 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Steele
105 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)