United States v. Steele
This text of 105 F.3d 603 (United States v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-3139
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM O. STEELE,
Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
-------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida --------------------------
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion: 117 F.3d 1231, 11th Cir. July 24, 1997)
(December 4, 1997)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
B Y T H E C O U R T :
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll
on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this
court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en
banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this
court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 F.3d 603, 1997 WL 28972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steele-ca11-1997.