United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee

45 F.3d 1303

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1995

Docket93-50561, 93-50608, 93-50562 and 93-50609

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 45 F.3d 1303 (United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee, 45 F.3d 1303 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

All of the panel members have voted to deny the petitions for rehearing of both defendants.

Judge BROWNING and Judge FLETCHER have voted to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc of both defendants and Judge FITZGERALD has so recommended.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote as to whether to take the case en banc. A vote was taken. The request failed to secure the affirmative vote of a majority of the active non-recused members of the court. Judge Trott was recused.

The petitions for rehearing of both defendants are denied and the suggestions for rehearing en banc of both defendants are rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

All of the panel members have voted to deny the petitions for rehearing of both defendants.

Judge BROWNING and Judge FLETCHER have voted to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc of both defendants and Judge FITZGERALD has so recommended.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote as to whether to take the case en banc. A vote was taken. The request failed to secure the affirmative vote of a majority of the active non-recused members of the court. Judge Trott was recused.

The petitions for rehearing of both defendants are denied and the suggestions for rehearing en banc of both defendants are rejected.

In Re: Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation. Edmund J. Janas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc., Deanna Brody Andrea S. Donald Israel Buck Ruth Buck Denise Struthers Thomas G. Di Cicco Ira Steven B. Ewall Rosalyn Golaine Jerry Krimmary Anne Beke Herman Grossman Samuel J. Reiner Dennis Lucas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc.

195 F.3d 521 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)

Janas v. McCracken

195 F.3d 521 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)

People v. Meredith

586 N.W.2d 538 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1998)

United States v. Jerald John Meola

85 F.3d 638 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee

45 F.3d 1303 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stacey-c-koon-cross-appellee-united-states-of-america-ca9-1995.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack