United States v. Sorto

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6831

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUAN FRANCISCO SORTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00251-JCC-2)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Francisco Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Juan Francisco Sorto appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sorto’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Sorto, No. 1:96-cr-00251-JCC-

2 (E.D. Va. May 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -