United States v. Sorto

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-8069

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO SORTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00251-AVB)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roberto Sorto, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roberto Sorto appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to produce documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Sorto, No 1:96-cr-00251-AVB (E.D. Va. Nov.

28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -