United States v. Smith
This text of 18 C.M.A. 585 (United States v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Tested by the standards laid down in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, the inquiry into the accused’s plea of guilty would not meet the criterion that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in Care. In this case, however, the accused, in mitigation, admitted his guilt, saying: “Gentlemen, my plea of guilty is, in fact, I am guilty of all the specifications and charges there. As far as an excuse, I have no excuse.” We are, therefore, satisfied that accused’s guilty plea, in this case, is provident.
Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 C.M.A. 585, 18 USCMA 585, 40 C.M.R. 297, 1969 CMA LEXIS 711, 1969 WL 6087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smith-cma-1969.