United States v. Smith
This text of 19 C.M.A. 491 (United States v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Evidence of an Article 15 disciplinary action for failing to obey an order to get a haircut was admissible against the appellant following his conviction for two aggravated assaults and carrying a concealed weapon, offenses occurring after August 1, 1969. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970); United States v Wheat, 19 USCMA 491, 42 CMR 93 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 C.M.A. 491, 19 USCMA 491, 42 C.M.R. 93, 1970 CMA LEXIS 849, 1970 WL 7002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smith-cma-1970.