United States v. Smith

20 C.M.A. 444, 20 USCMA 444, 43 C.M.R. 284, 1971 CMA LEXIS 693, 1971 WL 12777
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedApril 2, 1971
DocketNo. 23,411
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 C.M.A. 444 (United States v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Smith, 20 C.M.A. 444, 20 USCMA 444, 43 C.M.R. 284, 1971 CMA LEXIS 693, 1971 WL 12777 (cma 1971).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The Court granted'two issues in this case. One concerns the failure of the military judge to inform the appellant that if he was represented by civilian counsel his detailed military counsel could continue to act' as an associate counsel if Smith so desired. United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970), decided this issue against the appellant. Both in Turner and in the instant case, appointed military counsel represented the appellants.

Failure of the military judge to obtain in writing the appellant’s request for military judge alone requires reversal of the appellant’s conviction, however. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Taft
21 C.M.A. 68 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 C.M.A. 444, 20 USCMA 444, 43 C.M.R. 284, 1971 CMA LEXIS 693, 1971 WL 12777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smith-cma-1971.