United States v. Shorter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2002·No. 02-6077·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-6078

No. 02-6107

Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,

No. 02-6121

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-192-A)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Shorter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

William Shorter, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for stenographic notes and records relating to

three of his co-conspirators: Lebby, Brown, and Roberts. He also

appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

reconsideration of the court’s Aug. 27, 2001, order denying access

to records. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No.

CA-98-192-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 21, 2001 & entered Dec. 26, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shorter, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Shorter (United States v. Shorter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.