United States v. Shorter

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Shorter

28 F. App'x 308

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2002·No. Nos. 01-7692, 01-8041·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Shorter, Jr. appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for sealed records and transcripts. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No. CR-98-192-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2001; filed Oct. 11, 2001 & entered Oct. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Shorter, Jr. appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for sealed records and transcripts. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No. CR-98-192-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2001; filed Oct. 11, 2001 & entered Oct. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Shorter, 28 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

28 F. App'x 308 (United States v. Shorter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.