United States v. Shorter

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Shorter

55 F. App'x 219

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 2003

Docket02-7783

StatusUnpublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 219 (United States v. Shorter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Shorter, 55 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Shorter, Jr., filed an appeal on July 17, 2002, in a district court case in which he challenges his sentence. The notice of appeal does not identify an order from which he appeals. We have examined the notice of appeal and the record in the district court action and find no underlying order to review. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all Shorter’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Shorter, Jr., filed an appeal on July 17, 2002, in a district court case in which he challenges his sentence. The notice of appeal does not identify an order from which he appeals. We have examined the notice of appeal and the record in the district court action and find no underlying order to review. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all Shorter’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shorter-ca4-2003.