United States v. Shade
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6927
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER LEE SHADE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00045-JPB-4)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lee Shade appeals the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion for
reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Shade, No. 3:02-cr-00045-JPB-4 (N.D.W.
Va. May 28, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247
(4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Shade (United States v. Shade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.