United States v. Shade

318 F. App'x 246
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2009
DocketNo. 08-6927
StatusPublished

This text of 318 F. App'x 246 (United States v. Shade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shade, 318 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Shade appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shade, No. 3:02-cr-00045-JPB-M (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shade-ca4-2009.