United States v. Selso Orona
This text of 987 F.3d 892 (United States v. Selso Orona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 SELSO RANDY ORONA, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER
Filed February 18, 2021
Order 2 UNITED STATES V. ORONA
COUNSEL
Michael Bailey, United States Attorney; Krissa M. Lanham, Assistant United States Attorney; United States Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender; Keith J. Hilzendeger, Assistant Federal Public Defender; Office of the Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona; Jean-Claude André, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Santa Monica, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
This Court previously stayed en banc proceedings in this case pending the Supreme Court’s issuance of a decision in United States v. Borden, 769 Fed. App’x 266 (6th Cir. 2019), cert. granted, No. 19-5410, 2020 WL 981806 (U.S. Mar. 2, 2020) (mem.). On January 28, 2021, the government informed this Court that defendant-appellee, Selso Randy Orona, passed away. Due to Orona’s death, we dismiss this appeal and “remand this case to the district court for dismissal of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus as moot and for further proceedings as may be required, including the vacatur of any prior orders.” Stanley v. Ryan, 716 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2013).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
987 F.3d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-selso-orona-ca9-2021.