United States v. Selso Orona

942 F.3d 1159
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2019·No. 17-17508·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix SELSO RANDY ORONA, ORDER Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Murguia and Hunsaker did not participate in the deliberations or vote

in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Selso Orona, 942 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2019).

942 F.3d 1159 (United States v. Selso Orona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Randly Begay
33 F.4th 1081 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)