Milo Stanley v. Charles Ryan

716 F.3d 1272, 2013 WL 2320727, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 2013
Docket11-99014
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 716 F.3d 1272 (Milo Stanley v. Charles Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milo Stanley v. Charles Ryan, 716 F.3d 1272, 2013 WL 2320727, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10650 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner Milo McCormick Stanley (Stanley) appealed the district court’s va-catur of an evidentiary hearing ordered by this court and denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On May 10, 2013, Stanley’s counsel informed this court that Stanley passed away in prison. Due to Stanley’s death, we dismiss his appeal and “remand this case to the district court for dismissal of the petition for a writ of habe-as corpus as moot and for further proceedings as may be required, including the vacatur of any prior orders.” Farmer v. McDaniel, 692 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir.2012) (citation omitted).

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Selso Orona
987 F.3d 892 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
Yowell v. Baca
D. Nevada, 2021
Danny Enquist v. F. Chavez
751 F.3d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
716 F.3d 1272, 2013 WL 2320727, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milo-stanley-v-charles-ryan-ca9-2013.