Danny Enquist v. F. Chavez

751 F.3d 1138, 2014 WL 2090028, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9383
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2014
Docket12-17560
StatusUnpublished

This text of 751 F.3d 1138 (Danny Enquist v. F. Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danny Enquist v. F. Chavez, 751 F.3d 1138, 2014 WL 2090028, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9383 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

California state prisoner Danny James Enquist appealed the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. On March 17, 2014, the Attorney General of the State of California informed the court that Enquist had died in prison on November 10, 2013. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings as may be required, including dismissal of the petition and vacatur of all orders. See Stanley v. Ryan, 716 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir.2013).

DISMISSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milo Stanley v. Charles Ryan
716 F.3d 1272 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 F.3d 1138, 2014 WL 2090028, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danny-enquist-v-f-chavez-ca9-2014.