United States v. Scott
This text of 55 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Albert Manning Scott, Sr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on Scott’s motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scott-ca4-2003.