United States v. Scott
This text of 23 F. App'x 167 (United States v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eulee Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Scott, Nos. CR-95-912; CA-01-2782 (D.S.C. July 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *168 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scott-ca4-2002.